Reimbursement

To All Key Providers and Provider Society and/or Association Contacts:
Please be advised that on 5/23/2008, a number of providers, vendors, and clearinghouses migrated to full NPI compliance without testing. As a result, a significant volume of claims have been and continue to be forwarded to BCBSMA with errors in the taxpayer ID field. This field directs us to pay a specific entity and must be correctly and consistently correlated with the submitted NPI. After pending impacted claims for a period of time to research the root cause of the errors, we decided that in order to avoid payments to incorrect provider entities, BCBSMA would begin rejecting claims on 6/21/2007. These claims are being rejected with a specific message (X419) directing providers how to contact BCBSMA to resolve their specific issue.

BCBSMA has communicated with providers about this issue electronically,via the attached FYI (BCBSMA Reject Code FYI PC-1346) , and via the aforementioned rejection message. We are forwarding this information on to you to ensure you are aware of the situation, and to request your ongoing assistance in educating as many providers as possible about the problem and how it can be resolved if they are encountering it. 

Please direct providers (if they need to update their information on file with BCBSMA) to call 800-419-4419.

Thank you for your assistance.
posted 07/01/2008

Medicare to Hold Part B Claims for First 10 Days of July
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has instructed its contractors to not process any provider claims for the first 10 business days of July to lessen the impact of the projected 10.6 percent reduction in payments that is scheduled to take place on July 1.

Last week, the Senate failed to pass legislation that would avert cuts to the Medicare Part B fee schedule before adjourning for their 4 th of July recess.   The House passed legislation would have retained reimbursement rates at the current 2008 level and provided for a 1.1 percent increase in 2009.   The Senate is expected to again vote on Medicare legislation when they return the week of July 7. .

CMS has the authority to hold payment on claims submitted the first two weeks of July.  Currently, CMS is not permitted to pay claims sooner than 14 days (29 days for paper claims) and not later than the 30th day after they have been submitted by the provider for payment. By holding claims for health care services that are delivered on or after July 1, CMS will not be making any payments on the 10.6 percent reduction until July 15, at the earliest.  Meanwhile, all claims for services delivered on or before June 30 will be processed and paid in regular order.

Please contact reimbursement@asha.org should you have any questions regarding the claims submission during this period.  For questions or further information related to congressional activities on the Medicare legslation, please contact Ingrida Lusis, ASHA’s Director of Federal and Political Advocacy, at ilusis@asha.org or by phone at 202-624-5951.
posted 07/01/2008
 
New Medicare Speech-Language Pathology Rules Published
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revised Chapter 15 of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, sections 220 and 230 that impact the provision of speech-language pathology services. The implementation date is June 9, 2008.

Billing for speech-language pathology services by a private practice occupational therapist or physical therapist: This provision has been deleted because many states do not allow services to be billed by practitioners who have no supervisory responsibility over the practitioner rendering the service. The contractors may interpret billing rules consistent with state and local policies. (230.3.B)

Long Term Treatment Goals: When the episode of care is anticipated to be longer than the certification/recertification period, the long-term goal may be specific to the part of the episode that is being certified. If the episode is short, measurable goals may not be achievable; documentation should state the clinical reasons progress cannot be shown. (220.1.2.B)

Treatment Duration/Frequency: CMS recognizes that, depending on the individual's needs, it may be most efficient and effective to provide short-term intensive treatment or longer term and less frequent treatment. When a tapered frequency of treatment is planned, the exact number of treatments per week is not required in the plan because changes should be made based on assessment of daily progress. (220.1.2.B)

Plan of Treatment Dates: Notation in the medical record of the beginning date is recommended but not required. This assists the Medicare contractor in determining the dates of service for which the plan was effective. (220.1.2.B)

Certification/Recertification: A physician/NPP may certify or recertify a plan for whatever duration of treatment the physician/NPP determines is appropriate, up to a maximum of 90 calendar days. Treatment beyond the duration certified by the physician/NPP requires that a plan be recertified for the extended duration of treatment. It is not required that the same physician/NPP who participated initially in recommending or planning the patient's care certify and/or recertify the plans. (220.1.2.C)

Physician/NPP Visits: If the physician wishes to restrict the patient's treatment beyond a certain date when the physician has determined that a visit is required, the physician should certify a plan only until the date of the visit. (220.1.2.C)

Delayed Certification: An example is given of a certified plan of care ending March 30th and a new plan of care for continued treatment after March 30th is developed or signed by a speech-language pathologist on April 15th and that plan is subsequently certified; that certification may be considered delayed and acceptable, effective from the first treatment date after March 30th for the frequency and duration as described in the plan. Documentation should continue to indicate that therapy during the delay is medically necessary, as it would for any treatment. (220.1.2.D)

Progress Reports: Clarification is made that the Progress Report Period is at least once every 10 treatment days or at least once during each 30 calendar days, whichever is less . Dates for recertification of plans of care do not affect the dates for required Progress Reports. (220.3.D)

Discharge Summary: In provider settings where the physician/NPP writes a discharge summary and the discharge documentation meets the requirements of the provider setting, a separate discharge note written by a therapist is not required. (220.3.D)

Signature of the Qualified Speech-Language Pathologist: Since a clinician must be identified on the Plan of Care and the Progress Report, the name and professional identification of the supervisor responsible for the treatment is assumed to be the clinician who wrote the plan or report. When the treatment is supervised without active participation by the supervisor, the supervisor is not required to cosign the Treatment Note written by a qualified professional. (220.3.E)

Speech-Language Pathologists as Employees or Contractors of Physician Practices: For outpatient speech-language pathology services that are provided incident to the services of physicians/NPPs, even though the requirement for speech-language pathology licensure does not apply; all other personnel qualifications do apply so that the individual must meet the education and experience required for the CCC-SLP or meet the educational requirements and be in the Clinical Fellowship. (230.3.B)

Aural Rehabilitation Scope of Coverage: The coverage category, "aural rehabilitation," is replaced by "Impairments of the Auditory System." Auditory processing coverage includes but is not limited to services for certain neurological impairments or the absence of natural auditory stimulation that results in impaired ability to process sound. (230.3.D.3)

The complete text of CMS Transmittal 88 is available on the CMS Web site at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R88BP.pdf . For further information, please contact reimbursement@asha.org .

posted 05/28/08

Health Care Economics Committee Update

The ASHA Health Care Economics Committee (HCEC) met at the new national office Friday March 14 through Sunday March 16. Several members made Capitol Hill visits on Friday morning before the meeting began. A representative from CMS briefed the committee on changes to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual regarding audiology coverage that will become effective April 1, 2008. Changes include clarification that vestibular testing, auditory processing evaluation, tinnitus evaluation, and diagnostic programming of audiology prosthetic devices are included as diagnostic testing for Medicare. It also clarifies that automated computer-administered hearing tests are screening tests and, therefore, are not covered. It also indicates that “a Doctor of Audiology (AuD) 4th year student with a provisional license from a State does not qualify unless he or she also holds a master’s or doctoral degree in audiology”. Also discussed were levels of supervision and how these relate to the use of neuropsychological codes.
Members of the ASHA Health Care Economics Advocacy Team discussed various issues with the committee, including a CCI edit that prohibits billing endoscopy and videostroboscopy on the same date of service, the National Quality Forum, and using different levels of service for a CPT code when negotiating with individual payors.

Wayne Holland, representative to the AMA CPT panel, updated the committee on the presentation AAO-HNS made to change the language in the introduction of the Special Otorhinolaryngological Services Section of the CPT Code Book. The changes were suggested to reflect current clinical usage. A new code for canalith repositioning was presented. The outcome of each of these presentations is not available at this time. Bob Fifer, representative to the RUC panel, updated the committee on collaboration on work surveys among the American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Otoloryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, American Physical Therapy Association, American Chiropractic Association, American Academy of Audiology and ASHA on the proposed canalith repositioning code.
Bernie Patashnik, consultant to the committee, presented information on the future of Medicare and how the HCEC can respond to expected change. The committee discussed how our members might get more involved in the PQRI measures. Additionally, the need to gather information about how managed Medicare is affecting our services was considered because a greater percentage of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolling in managed Medicare plans. We also discussed the impact of Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) on our members. Kathryn Phillips Campbell of the National Business Group on Health (NBGH) joined the committee by conference call to share information on the Employer’s Toolkit they developed on Investing in Maternal and Child Health. NBGH members are primarily Fortune 500 companies and large public sector employers.

The speech-language pathology subcommittee of the HCEC discussed coding questions received from members (e.g., how to code for FEES and evaluation for tracheotomy speaking valve) and the draft position statement on endoscopy. They decided to move forward with a proposed ICD-9-CM change to separate phonation and resonance. They continue to collaborate with Special Interest Division on Fluency and Fluency Disorders on proposed changes to where the codes concerning stuttering are located in the ICD-9-CM book. The goal is to present the proposals at the September meeting of the ICD-9 CM Coordination & Maintenance Committee. They continued the on-going discussion about ‘work’ for speech-language pathologists. Changes in reimbursement rates as a result of the elimination of the non-physician work pool put codes without ‘work’ (e.g. the SGD/AAC codes, clinical swallow and modified barium swallow codes) in line for significant reductions by 2010.

The audiology subcommittee discussed proposed codes for VNG and hopes to present this to the CPT Editorial Panel later this year. They are also investigating developing an audiology evaluation code to be used when a patient is seen by an audiologist only (and not an otolaryngologist) to cover the pre and post service activities (e.g., taking case history, counseling results, etc). A future code proposal under consideration is the supplemental speech recognition test. The sub-committee reviewed a HCPCS proposal from the VA and endorsed it.

After hearing an update on the Strategic Pathway to Excellence from Steve White, ex officio, the committee updated the HCEC’s 2008-2009 Strategic Plan. Major categories of activities in the plan include: Education of Members; CPT Code Development; ICD Code Development; Professional Component; Trends; and Collaboration and Consultation.

The members of the HCEC are:

Audiology
Tom Rees
Bob Fifer
Neil Shepard
Stuart Trembath
Bob Woods

Speech-Language Pathology
Nancy Swigert
Becky Cornett
Bernard Henri
Wayne Holland
Dee Adams Nikjeh

Ex Officio

Steve White

Monitoring Vice President
DeAnne Owre

Questions about this report may be directed to: swhite@asha.org or nswigert@aol.com .
updated 4/22/08